Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

What Type of Family Structure Dominates Middle and South America?

Family support system involving ii married individuals supporting their offspring

A Multigenerational Family

An American family composed of the mother, father, children, and extended family

The traditional family unit structure in the United States is considered a family support system involving two married individuals providing intendance and stability for their biological offspring. However, this 2-parent, heterosexual, nuclear family has get less prevalent, and nontraditional family forms accept become more mutual.[2] The family is created at birth and establishes ties across generations.[3] Those generations, the extended family of aunts and uncles, grandparents, and cousins, can concord meaning emotional and economic roles for the nuclear family.

Over time, the structure has had to adjust to very influential changes, including divorce and more single-parent families, teenage pregnancy and unwed mothers, same-sexual activity marriage, and increased interest in adoption. Social movements such as the feminist movement and the stay-at-domicile father have contributed to the creation of alternative family forms, generating new versions of the American family.

At a glance [edit]

Nuclear family unit [edit]

The Comos at dwelling c. 1955. On the sofa are his older son Ronnie and wife Roselle. In the chair with her doll is his daughter, Terri, and reading on the flooring are son David and his Dad.

Marriages, Families & Intimate Relationships, 1970–2000

The nuclear family has been considered the "traditional" family construction since the Soviet Spousal relationship scare in the cold state of war of the 1950s. The nuclear family consists of a mother, father, and the children. The two-parent nuclear family has get less prevalent, and pre-American and European family forms have become more common.[two] Commencement in the 1970s in the U.s.a., the structure of the "traditional" nuclear American family began to change. It was the women in the households that began to make this alter. They decided to begin careers outside of the home and not alive co-ordinate to the male figures in their lives.[4]

These include aforementioned-sexual activity relationships, single-parent households, adopting individuals, and extended family systems living together. The nuclear family is also having fewer children than in the past.[five] The percentage of nuclear-family households is approximately half what it was at its peak in the eye of the 20th century.[half-dozen] The percentage of married-couple households with children under xviii, only without other family members (such as grandparents), has declined to 23.5% of all households in 2000 from 25.6% in 1990, and from 45% in 1960. In November 2016, the Electric current Population Survey of the United States Demography Bureau reported that 69 percentage of children nether the age of 18 lived with two parents, which was a decline from 88 percent in 1960.[seven]

Single parent [edit]

Mother with her children.

A single parent (also termed alone parent or sole parent) is a parent who cares for one or more children without the aid of the other biological parent. Historically, single-parent families ofttimes resulted from death of a spouse, for example in childbirth. This term is can exist broken down into 2 types: sole parent and co-parent. A sole parent is managing all of the responsibilities of kid-rearing on their own without financial or emotional assistance. A sole parent can be a product of abandonment or expiry of the other parent or can be a unmarried adoption or artificial insemination. A co-parent is someone who all the same gets some type of aid with the child/children. Unmarried-parent homes are increasing as married couples divorce, or every bit single couples have children. Although widely believed to be detrimental to the mental and physical well being of a child, this type of household is tolerated.[8]

This figure illustrates the changing structure of families in the U.S. Only 7% of families in the U.S. in 2002 were "traditional" families in the sense that the husband worked and earned a sufficient income for the wife and kids to stay home. Many families are now dual-earner families. The "other" group includes the many households that are headed by a single parent.

The percentage of single-parent households has doubled in the last three decades, but that percentage tripled between 1900 and 1950.[9] The sense of marriage every bit a "permanent" institution has been weakened, allowing individuals to consider leaving marriages more readily than they may have in the by.[10] Increasingly, single-parent families are due to out of wedlock births, especially those due to unintended pregnancy. From 1960 to 2016, the percentage of U.S. children under 18 living with ane parent increased from 9 pct (viii pct with mothers, ane percent with fathers) to 27 percent (23 percentage with mothers, 4 percent with fathers).[7]

Stepfamilies [edit]

Stepfamilies are becoming more familiar in America. Divorce rates are rising and the remarriage charge per unit is rising as well, therefore, bringing two families together making stepfamilies. Statistics prove that there are 1,300 new stepfamilies forming every day. Over half of American families are remarried, that is 75% of marriages ending in divorce, remarry.[11]

Extended family [edit]

The extended family consists of grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins. In some circumstances, the extended family unit comes to live either with or in identify of a fellow member of the nuclear family. An case includes elderly parents who move in with their children due to old age. This places big demands on the caregivers, particularly the female relatives who choose to perform these duties for their extended family.[12]

Historically, amongst certain Asian and Native American cultures, the family unit structure consisted of a grandmother and her children, especially daughters, who raised their ain children together and shared child care responsibilities. Uncles, brothers, and other male relatives sometimes helped out. Romantic relationships between men and women were formed and dissolved with little touch on on the children who remained in the mother's extended family.

Roles and relationships [edit]

Married partners [edit]

Saying grace before carving the turkey at Thanksgiving dinner in the habitation of Earle Landis in Neffsville, Pennsylvania.

A married couple was divers as a "husband and wife enumerated equally members of the same household" by the U.S. Census Agency,[xiii] but they volition be categorizing same-sex couples as married couples if they are married. Aforementioned-sexual activity couples who were married were previously recognized by the Census Agency equally unmarried partners.[14] Same-sex marriage is legally permitted across the country since June 26, 2015, when the Supreme Court issued its determination in Obergefell v. Hodges. Polygamy is illegal throughout the U.S.[15]

Although cousin marriages are illegal in nigh states, they are legal in many states, the District of Columbia and some territories. Some states have some restrictions or exceptions for cousin marriages and/or recognize such marriages performed out-of-land. Since the 1940s, the U.s. marriage charge per unit has decreased, whereas rates of divorce have increased.[16]

Unwed partners [edit]

Living as unwed partners is also known as cohabitation. The number of heterosexual single couples in the U.s.a. has increased tenfold, from about 400,000 in 1960 to more than five meg in 2005.[17] This number would increment by at to the lowest degree another 594,000 if same-sexual activity partners were included.[17] Of all unmarried couples, nearly 1 in 9 (11.i% of all single-partner households) are homosexual.[17]

The cohabitation lifestyle is condign more popular in today'southward generation.[18] It is more convenient for couples not to go married because it can be cheaper and simpler. Every bit divorce rates rise in society, the want to go married is less attractive for couples uncertain of their long-term plans.[17]

Parents [edit]

A new male parent holds his kid for the commencement fourth dimension in Loretto Hospital, New Ulm, Minnesota.

Parents can exist either the biological mother or biological father, or the legal guardian for adopted children. Traditionally, mothers were responsible for raising the kids while the male parent was out providing financially for the family. The age grouping for parents ranges from teenage parents to grandparents who have decided to raise their grandchildren, with teenage pregnancies fluctuating based on race and civilisation.[19] Older parents are financially established and generally have fewer problems raising children compared to their teenage counterparts.[20] In 2013, the highest teenage birth rate was in Alabama, and the everyman in Wyoming.[21] [22]

Housewives [edit]

A housewife or "homemaker" is a married woman who is not employed outside the home to earn income, but stays at abode and takes care of the home and children. This includes doing common chores such as cooking, washing, cleaning, etc. The roles of women working within the house have changed drastically equally more women outset to pursue careers. The amount of time women spend doing housework declined from 27 hours per calendar week in 1965, to less than 16 hours in 1995, but information technology is withal substantially more housework than their male person partners.[23]

"Breadwinners" [edit]

A breadwinner is the principal financial provider in the family. Historically the hubby has been the breadwinner; that tendency is changing every bit wives offset to take reward of the women's movement to gain financial independence for themselves. According to The New York Times, "In 2001, wives earned more than their spouses in almost a third of married households where the wife worked."[24]

Stay-at-dwelling house dads [edit]

Stay-at-home dads or "househusbands" are fathers that do non participate in the workforce and stay at home to raise their children—the male equivalent to housewives. Stay-at-dwelling house dads are non as pop in American gild.[25] According to the U.S. Demography Bureau, "In that location are an estimated 105,000 'stay-at-dwelling' dads. These are married fathers with children nether fifteen years of age who are not in the workforce primarily so they can care for family members, while their wives work for a living outside the home. Stay-at-home dads care for 189,000 children."[26]

Children [edit]

Only kid families [edit]

An only child (unmarried kid) is one without any biological or adopted brothers or sisters. Simply children often perform amend in school and in their careers than children with siblings.[23]

Childfree and childlessness [edit]

Childfree couples choose to not accept children. These include young couples, who plan to have children later, as well as those who do not plan to take whatever children. Involuntary childlessness may exist caused by infertility, medical problems, death of a child, or other factors.

Adopted children [edit]

Adopted children are children that were given upwardly at nascency, abandoned or were unable to be cared for past their biological parents. They may have been put into foster care before finding their permanent residence. It is particularly hard[ clarification needed ] for adopted children to get adopted from foster care: 50,000 children were adopted in 2001.[27] The boilerplate age of these children was vii,[ clarification needed ] which shows that fewer older children were adopted.[27]

Mod family models [edit]

Same-sex activity marriage, adoption, and kid rearing [edit]

Same-sex parents are gay, lesbian, or bisexual couples that cull to raise children. Nationally, 66% of female same-sex couples and 44% of male same-sex couples live with children under 18 years former.[25] In the 2000 United States Demography, there were 594,000 households that claimed to be headed past same-sex couples, with 72% of those having children.[28] In July 2004, the American Psychological Association concluded that "Overall results of inquiry suggests that the development, aligning, and well-being of children with lesbian and gay and bisexual parents practice not differ markedly from that of children with heterosexual parents."[29]

Single-parent households [edit]

Single-parent homes in America are increasingly common. With more children being born to single couples and to couples whose marriages later dissolve, more children live with only i parent. The proportion of children living with a never-married parent has grown, from 4% in 1960 to 42% in 2001.[thirty] Of all single-parent families, 83% are mother-child families.[30]

Adoption requirements [edit]

The adoption requirements and policies for adopting children have fabricated it harder for foster families and potential adoptive families to adopt. Before a family unit can adopt, they must go through the state, county, and agency criteria. Adoption agencies' criteria limited the importance of age of the adoptive parents, as well as the agency's desire for married couples over single adopters.[31] Adoptive parents also have to deal with criteria that are given by the nativity parents of the adoptive child. The unlike criteria for adopting children makes information technology harder for couples to adopt children in need,[31] but the strict requirements can assist protect the foster children from unqualified couples.[31]

Currently i,500,000 (2% of all U.Due south children) are adopted. In that location are different types of adoption; embryo adoption when a couple is having trouble conceiving a kid and instead cull to prefer an embryo that was created using another couple's sperm and egg conjoined outside the womb, this ofttimes occurs with leftover embryos from another couple's successful IVF cycle. international adoption where couples prefer children that come from foreign countries, and private adoption which is the most common form of adoption. In a private adoption, families can adopt children via licensed agencies or past directly contacting the child's biological parents.

Male/female part pressures [edit]

The traditional "begetter" and "mother" roles of the nuclear family have go blurred over time. Because of the women's movement'south push for women to engage in traditionally masculine pursuits in society, as women choose to sacrifice their child-bearing years to institute their careers, and equally fathers feel increasing pressure, likewise as desire, to be involved with tending to children, the traditional roles of fathers as the "breadwinners" and mothers as the "caretakers" take come into question.[32]

African-American family structure [edit]

The family unit structure of African-Americans has long been a matter of national public policy interest.[33] The 1965 written report by Daniel Patrick Moynihan, known as The Moynihan Report, examined the link between black poverty and family structure.[33] It hypothesized that the destruction of the Black nuclear family structure would hinder further progress toward economic and political equality.[33]

When Moynihan wrote in 1965 on the coming destruction of the Black family, the out-of-wedlock birthrate was 25% amidst Blacks.[34] In 1991, 68% of Blackness children were born outside of wedlock.[35] In 2011, 72% of Black babies were built-in to unwed mothers.[36] [37]

Tv set portrayals [edit]

The television industry initially helped create a stereotype of the American nuclear family. During the era of the baby boomers, families became a pop social topic, specially on television.[38] Family shows such equally Roseanne, All in the Family, Leave It to Beaver, The Cosby Prove, Married... with Children, The Jeffersons, and Adept Times, Everybody Loves Raymond have portrayed unlike social classes of families growing up in America. Those "perfect" nuclear families have inverse as the years passed and have go more than inclusive, showing unmarried-parent and divorced families, as well as older singles.[8] Television shows that show single-parent families include Half & Half, One on One, Murphy Brownish, and Gilmore Girls.

While it did non get a mutual occurrence the iconic image of the American family was started in the early-1930s. It was non until WWII that families mostly had the economic income in which to successfully propagate this lifestyle.[39]

See besides [edit]

  • Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States
  • Divorce in the United States
  • Work–family balance in the United States

International:

  • Japanese family structure

Farther reading [edit]

  • Mattox, William R. Jr., "America's family time dearth", Children Today, November-Dec, 1990

References [edit]

  1. ^ *Grove, Robert D.; Hetzel, Alice M. (1968). Vital Statistics Rates in the Us 1940-1960 (PDF) (Report). Public Health Service Publication. Vol. 1677. U.South. Department of Wellness, Education, and Welfare, U.S. Public Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics. p. 185.
    • Ventura, Stephanie J.; Bachrach, Christine A. (Oct 18, 2000). Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States, 1940-99 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 48. Centers for Disease Command and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. pp. 28–31.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady Due east.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Park, Melissa M. (February 12, 2002). Births: Final Information for 2000 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. fifty. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Organisation. p. 46.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Park, Melissa Chiliad.; Sutton, Paul D. (December 18, 2002). Births: Final Data for 2001 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 51. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Organization. p. 47.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Munson, Martha 50. (December 17, 2003). Births: Final Data for 2002 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 52. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Organization. p. 57.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Munson, Martha L. (September 8, 2005). Births: Final Information for 2003 (PDF) (Study). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 54. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Middle for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 52.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Kirmeyer, Sharon (September 29, 2006). Births: Last Data for 2004 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 55. Centers for Disease Command and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 57.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Kirmeyer, Sharon; Munson, Martha L. (December 5, 2007). Births: Concluding Data for 2005 (PDF) (Study). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 56. Centers for Disease Command and Prevention, National Middle for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 57.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Kirmeyer, Sharon; Mathews, T.J. (January 7, 2009). Births: Final Information for 2006 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 57. Centers for Disease Command and Prevention, National Center for Wellness Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 54.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Mathews, T.J.; Kirmeyer, Sharon; Osterman, Michelle J.M. (August ix, 2010). Births: Final Data for 2007 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 58. Centers for Illness Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 46.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Mathews, T.J.; Osterman, Michelle J.K. (Dec 8, 2010). Births: Final Data for 2008 (PDF) (Study). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 59. Centers for Illness Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Arrangement. p. 46.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Osterman, Michelle J.K.; Kirmeyer, Sharon; Mathews, T.J.; Wilson, Elizabeth C. (Nov 3, 2011). Births: Final Data for 2009 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 60. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 46.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Osterman, Michelle J.K.; Wilson, Elizabeth C.; Mathews, T.J. (Baronial 28, 2012). Births: Final Data for 2010 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 61. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Organization. p. 45.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Osterman, Michelle J.K.; Mathews, T.J. (June 28, 2013). Births: Terminal Data for 2011 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 62. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Middle for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Organisation. p. 43.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Osterman, Michelle J.K.; Curtin, Sally C. (December 30, 2013). Births: Last Data for 2012 (PDF) (Study). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 62. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Centre for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 41.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady Eastward.; Osterman, Michelle J.K.; Curtin, Sally C.; Mathews, T.J. (January 15, 2015). Births: Last Data for 2013 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 64. Centers for Affliction Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Organization. p. 40.
    • Hamilton, Brady Eastward.; Martin, Joyce A.; Osterman, Michelle J.K.; Curtin, Sally C.; Mathews, T.J. (December 23, 2015). Births: Concluding Information for 2014 (PDF) (Written report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 64. Centers for Affliction Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. pp. 7 & 41.
  2. ^ a b Edwards, H.N. (1987). Changing family unit structure and youthful well-existence. Periodical of Family Problems 8, 355–372
  3. ^ Beutler, Burr, Bahr, and Herrin (1989) p. 806; cited past Fine, Mark A. in Families in the United States: Their Electric current Condition and Future Prospects Copyright 1992
  4. ^ Stewart Foley, Michael (2013). Front Porch Politics The Forgotten Heyday of American Activism in the 1970s and 1980s. Hill and Wang. ISBN9780809047970.
  5. ^ "For First Time since the cold war, Nuclear Families Drib Below 25% of Households". Uscsumter.edu. May 15, 2001. Archived from the original on February 26, 2009. Retrieved 2009-07-27 .
  6. ^ Brooks, Story by David. "The Nuclear Family Was a Mistake". The Atlantic. ISSN 1072-7825. Retrieved October ii, 2020.
  7. ^ a b "The Majority of Children Live With Ii Parents, Demography Bureau Reports". United States Census Bureau. November 17, 2016. Retrieved May 23, 2021.
  8. ^ a b Benokraitis, North: Marriages & families, page 7. 6th edition, 2007
  9. ^ Benokraitis, North: Marriages & families, folio xviii. 6th edition, 2007
  10. ^ Glenn, Northward.D. (1987). Continuity versus change, sanguineness versus business: Views of the American family in the late 1980s. Journal of Family Problems 8, 348–354
  11. ^ Stewart, S.D. (2007). Brave New Stepfamilies. 1000 Oaks: Sage.
  12. ^ Brubaker, T.H. (1990). Continuity and change in afterwards life families: Grandparenthood, couple relationships and family caregiving. Gerentology Review three, 24–40
  13. ^ Teachman, Tedrow, Crowder. The Changing Census of America's Families Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 62 (Nov 2000) p. 1234
  14. ^ "Census to alter the way it counts gay married couples". Washington Post.
  15. ^ Barbara Bradley Hagerty (May 27, 2008). "Some Muslims in U.S. Quietly Engage in Polygamy". National Public Radio: All Things Considered. Retrieved July 23, 2009.
  16. ^ Teachman, Tedrow, Crowder. The Changing Census of America'due south Families. Journal of Union and the Family, Vol. 62 (Nov 2000) p. 1235
  17. ^ a b c d Benokraitis, N: Marriages & families, page 271. 6th edition, 2007
  18. ^ Benokraitis, N: Marriages & families, page 275. 6th edition, 2007
  19. ^ Benokraitis, Due north: Marriages & families, folio 326. sixth edition, 2007
  20. ^ Benokraitis, N: Marriages & families, pp. 328–329. sixth edition, 2007
  21. ^ "Births: Final Data for 2013, tables two, three" (PDF). U.S. Department of Wellness & Human being Services. Retrieved July 23, 2015.
  22. ^ "Trends in Teen Pregnancy and Childbearing". U.Southward. Section of Health & Human Services. Retrieved July 23, 2015.
  23. ^ a b Benokraitis, N: Marriages & families, page 367. 6th edition, 2007
  24. ^ Gardner, Ralph (November ten, 2003). "Alpha Women, Beta Men – When wives are the family breadwinners". Nymag.com. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
  25. ^ a b Benokraitis, N: Marriages & families, page 328. sixth edition, 2007
  26. ^ "US Demography Press Releases". Census.gov. Archived from the original on November xviii, 2003. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
  27. ^ a b "Child'southward Finalization Age (Grouped)". Acf.hhs.gov. Archived from the original on August 30, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
  28. ^ U.S. Census Bureau, Married-Couple and Single-Partner Households: 2000 (February 2003)
  29. ^ Meezan, William and Rauch, Jonathan. Gay Marriage, Aforementioned-sexual activity Parenting, and America's Children. The Future of Children Vol. 15 No. 2 Matrimony and Child Wellbeing (Autumn 2005) p. 102
  30. ^ a b Benokraitis, N: Marriages & families, folio 20–21. 6th edition, 2007
  31. ^ a b c "Review of Qualification Requirements for Prospective Adoptive Parents – Agencies, Agency, Alcohol, A". Adopting.adoption.com. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
  32. ^ Fine, Marking A. Families in the United States: Their Current Status and Futurity Prospects. Family Relations vol. 41 (Oct 1992) p. 431
  33. ^ a b c "U.Due south. Department of Labor -- History -- The Negro Family - The Case for National Action". world wide web.dol.gov. Archived from the original on Jan 20, 2017. Retrieved December 4, 2009.
  34. ^ Daniel P. Moynihan, The Negro Family unit: The Case for National Action, Washington, D.C., Function of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor, 1965.
  35. ^ National Review, Apr four, 1994, p. 24.
  36. ^ "Blacks struggle with 72 percent unwed mothers rate", Jesse Washington, NBC News, July eleven, 2010
  37. ^ "For Blacks, the Pyrrhic Victory of the Obama Era", Jason 50. Riley, The Wall Street Journal, Nov iv, 2012
  38. ^ Benokraitis, Due north: Marriages & families, page 7–8. 6th edition, 2007
  39. ^ Etuk, Lena. "How Family Structure has Changed". Oregon State Academy. Retrieved Apr sixteen, 2012.

External links [edit]

  • Single Parent Statistics
  • Same Sex activity Union, Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships
  • The Dilemma of the Simply Kid
  • Adoption Statistics
  • Stepfamily Statistics

cocountas1994.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_structure_in_the_United_States

Post a Comment for "What Type of Family Structure Dominates Middle and South America?"